Instead, only the revenues of the entire umbrella corporation are included. In essence, to do so would be to show sales figures twice. Similarly, the percentage change in sales is calculated on the most recent sales information provided.Īlso, individual printing companies that are part of larger graphic arts networks-such as Consolidated Graphics-are not listed separately. Therefore, printers that revised their previous year revenues may have changed their ranking as compared with where they were actually ranked in last year’s Printing Impressions 400. And, some firms that did participate, notably RR Donnelley, Transcontinental, Valassis and Vertis Communications, would or could not break down their annual sales by the various print market specialties that we track.Ĭompany rankings for the current and previous year are based on sales figures reported to us in 2010. As a result, printers shown on this list were most often reporting 2009 sales as their most recent figures.ĭespite our repeated attempts, various privately held companies refused to divulge their annual printing sales figures. We also did not allow companies that were close to completing a fiscal year to provide projected/estimated sales figures. The listings include company name and headquarters location parent company, if applicable current and previous year’s rankings most recent and previous year’s fiscal sales percentage change primary specialties principal officer(s) as well as number of employees, manufacturing plants and total press units.įinancial information for the PI 400 rankings was provided voluntarily by privately held and employee-owned firms. Now in its 27th year, the Printing Impressions 400 provides the industry’s most comprehensive ranking of the leading printing companies in the United States and Canada.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |